Categories
Uncategorized

McToxic

McDonald’s have started airing new advertisements that put forth the idea that all items on their menu are “natural, local, and grown on small farms”. One ad in particular shows a man, Frank Martinez, a farmer for McDonald’s going about his normal chores on the farm. By the end of the video the ad shows him eating his raw grown potatoes and says something along the lines of ” these potatoes taste good now, but when they are at Mcdonald’s they will be even better”. When it comes down to it, there is no connection between local farms and Mcdonald’s whatsoever. The corporation uses meats that come from traders like Golden State Foods. On the menu, the forever popular Big Mac says it has a “100% Angus beef patty”, when in reality is a mixture of other meats, lactic acid, artificial flavoring, and beef broth. In fact in it was stated that cattle was being fed nearly 25 million pounds of antibiotics a year, roughly 8 times the amount given to humans to cure diseases, but in retrospect can cause many outbreaks in bacteria in animals resistant to some drugs. These antibiotics were used for making the cattle healthier and also faster growth. Not only are these ads deceiving but they are slowing greenwashing the consumers since they are showing their potential costumers that their food is actually natural and local. It also shows that they actually care what you are putting into your mouth when in reality they just want more money being spent on the non-natural and antibiotic filled Big Mac.
Though McDonald’s have some fattening but tasty meals that are relatively cheap in cost and fast to eat, they are slowly impacting the planet and our species. The ways of farming for major corporations needs to be fast and furious to get to stores quickly and efficiently. This would mean that pesticides,GMOs and antibiotics would be added to the cattle and crops that are produced to quicken the time. This being done alters the environment drastically, affect the consumers bodies in negative ways. A way to change this, is to possibly, though quite extreme but already executed in Chicago, is to create basically an urban farm close to some Mcdonald’s in the area so that they could be actually “local and natural”. Urban farms could be anything from growing some vegetables and owning a hen house on the roof of a store, or buying a small spot of land nearby and doing the same. Doing so would create healthier produce. As for beef, it is pretty hard to get a cow in an urban setting, but another way could have a written guarantee that the cows don’t consume GMOs or antibiotics to fatten up faster. Though some reports have written that Mcdonald’s has reduced the amount of antibiotics consumed in their cattle, who not just get rid of them all together to make that Big Mac as natural as it as the potential to be.

ad with Frank Martinez: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xxlEkstcwM#t=125
http://www.organicconsumers.org/Toxic/mcdonalds_antibiotics.cfm
http://blogs.sacurrent.com/streetview/mcdonalds-greenwashing-ad-campaign-for-the-new-year/
Written by : Kam Eflin

Categories
Uncategorized

What the Organic Label Really Means

Although when the USDA originally created the organic seal in October of 2002 the intentions were pure, due to marketing and uninformed consumers, the label has taken on a life of its own. Upon spotting an organic seal on a package of strawberries in the super market, most consumers believe this product is safer, better for the environment and healthier opposed to the strawberries sitting beside them lacking the label. Organic, by most consumers’ definitions, has evolved into a cure-all, ethical, and environmentally friendly option. Consumers assume “organic” means chemical free, more nutritious, environmentally friendly, and hormone free. It’s become a romanticized back-to-nature obsession for those who can afford the label.

“People believe it must be better for you if it’s organic,” says Phil Howard, an assistant professor of community, food and agriculture at Michigan State University.

It’s not completely the consumers’ fault most define “organic” by these standards. Large companies that came out with organic lines of their products after it started becoming popular, Driscoll’s for example have run with this preconceived definition the consumer created for organic. Often using comforting words like natural and nurture alongside “organic” the consumer associated the definitions. As defined by the USDA, “Organic agriculture produces products using methods that preserve the environment and avoid most synthetic materials, such as pesticides and antibiotics.” ((Full Definition Here)) There are exceptions to the basic rule of not using synthetic materials, and the list of approved synthetic chemicals can be found here. USDA Approved ChemicalsI’m not arguing that the lack of conventional pesticides on produce is a bad thing, but I am pointing out that organic does not mean chemical free.
Secondly, it is not taken into account by the consumer the carbon footprint created by shipping organic strawberries from south America verse the much smaller footprint created by purchasing local sustainably grown berries. Driscoll’s produces majority of “organic” strawberries seen in the super market. For 8 months out of the year, Driscoll’s is sourcing their organic berries from “Central Mexico”. Although it is not directly Driscoll’s fault for the lack of informed consumer’s, from a marketing standpoint they have embraced the assumed definition of organic, allowing the customer to dismiss the fact that their berries are from thousands of miles away and dismissing the fact that outsourcing for produce greatly increases ones carbon footprint. By food traveling large distances, by planes, trains, trucks, and ships, the pollution is contributing to global warming and unhealthy air quality. Today, the typical American prepared meal contains, on average, ingredients from at least five countries outside the United States. Imports by airplane have a substantial impact on global warming pollution. In 2005, the import of fruits, nuts, and vegetables into California by airplane released more than 70,000 tons of CO2, which is equivalent to more than 12,000 cars on the road. (National Resource Defense Council) I am not dismissing the organic produce market or claiming that conventional produce is better for you, but I am claiming that when making the decision to buy organic imported produce verse local sustainably grown produce, the local produce is most likely less daunting on the environment.
Choosing local produce supports your community and reduces fuel consumption and pollution associated with transporting food all by eating food directly from a farmer. Although not all local growers may be organic, because they are growing on a small scale many utilize many organic practices and grow using sustainable practices. Farmer’s markets are a great resource to find local food and connect directly with growers. As food trade has greatly increased with population increase, you can make an impact by choosing food grown closer to home.