Post by: Jeff South
We’ve posted our comment and our research paper on Regulations.gov regarding the FAA’s proposed rule governing the commercial use of drones.
That means we’re all now part of the public record. Who knows — maybe the FAA will cite our comments in the final rules.
Florina found a helpful video tutorial on how to fly a drone. As she said on her blog, this might be a model of the type of skills someone would have to demonstrate in order to get a UAV license.
Along the same lines, Gary Gillam came across a nifty tablet/smartphone app that simulates flying a quadcopter. It’s called QuadcopterFx Simulator. Here’s the trailer:
Here is a link to the iOS (iPad and iPhone) version on iTunes.
Google Play has the Android version.
Gary loaded the app on an iPad, and Lea and a few other students played the simulation after taking the final exam today. I think it was Shivani who suggested that this simulation could be part of the UAV certification process. Obviously, it would be best to require prospective drone operators to fly a real UAV and demonstrate hands-on competency. But if that’s too bureaucratic, showing your ability with a computer simulation would be better than nothing. So I included this idea in our paper (which I’m about to email you).
Scary story #1 from today’s NYTimes:
Scary story #2 from today’s NYTimes:
An organization called No Fly Zone has introduced a website where individuals, business owners and others who do not want drones overhead can enter their addresses into a database. Those addresses will be provided to drone manufacturers who have agreed to program their devices not to fly over those locations.
Drone video of University of Richmond, via Facebook
After hours of flying drones and editing footage, we present the University of Richmond campus from a 500 ft. perspective. Student contributors: Drone Pilot – Killian McGiboney, Video Producers – Chris Miller & Quinn Hynes, Music Artist – Nick Yeutter
Posted by Forum Magazine on Tuesday, April 21, 2015
2. What Matt Waite of Nebraska’s Drone Journalism Lab plans to tell the FAA
3. What we plan to tell the FAA (our paper)
4. Your final exam — start by 9:55 a.m. (at least 50 minutes)
Choose one of the two questions below. Write an answer of at least 200 words and no more than 400. You can use any resources you’d like, including the Internet (with our class website) and our class paper (of which you’ll have a copy). Here are the questions you can choose from:
Option 1: Think of a scenario in which you might use a UAV to shoot video — it could be for news, an ad, a feature film, whatever. Assume you’re doing this in a country that doesn’t have any specific rules governing drones; the only requirement is “Just be safe.” Describe your scenario (what you want to shoot). How would you safely shoot your drone video? What precautions would you take?
Option 2: Imagine it’s 2016 and the FAA has adopted its rules governing commercial use of drones. Now somebody has to educate people about the rules. Who should do that? Propose a strategy for how to teach current and prospective drone pilots how to comply with the FAA rules. What kinds of organizations (such as the AMA or hobby shops) might be involved? And what should they teach? It’s OK to speculate on what rules you think the FAA will approve.
Dr. Robert Klenke of VCU’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering discussed the research he has done with model aircraft for NASA. A few takeaways:
Quadcopters can go haywire. Bob showed us a video of a drone that completely malfunctioned. It refused to obey the controller and flew off into a tree. Suppose it had hit a bystander?
Bob also noted that if you’re a member of the Academy of Model Aeronautics and you want to fly your UAV at an AMA flying field, you must demonstrate your flying skills. The rules proposed by the FAA wouldn’t require UAV pilots to pass a flying test.
There’s a wide variation among model aircraft. Bob has done research with a fixed-wing vehicle that has an 11-foot wingspan and weighs 50 pounds. That’s a far cry from a 4-pound quadcopter.
Ice-breaker: drone racing — who knew this was a thing?
1. Guest speaker: Dr. Robert Klenke, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University
Dr. Klenke’s research includes UAS.
2. We’ll review the draft of our white paper.
3. We’ll discuss what to submit to the FAA. (Should we submit the entire paper as a Word document? Or specific comments about certain rules? Should we submit one long comment — or multiple comments?)
4. Discussion of our final exam
Hi, all. Thanks for your attention in class today. I’ve massaged the outline for our paper — and I changed some of your assignments a bit to make sure we have all the important bases covered in our paper. The outline is here.
That is a Google Doc which you’ve all be authorized to edit. Type (or paste) your contribution to the paper directly into the Google Doc.
A few ice-breakers
This is the launch video for 3D Robotics’s Solo, a new drone from a new company that is creating a lot of hype at the National Association of Broadcasters conference happening now in Las Vegas. People are really stoked about it because it is incredibly intuitive to fly and has many features that make it better filmmaking tool than competitors, especially the cable cam function. The Solo is only $999, which is lower than the new DJI Phantom 3 by a few hundred dollars, but does not include a built-in camera.
UAS laws in other countries
Here is another rundown of the UAS rules in different countries, courtesy of the Missouri Journalism Drone Journalism Program. More…
Ice-breakers du jour (from our Facebook group):
I wanted to share a roundup of interesting UAS stories to kickstart ideas before the presentations on Tuesday. These are from the Drone Roundup by the Center for the Study of the Drone at Bard College.
Here’s an interesting story from Motherboard, the technology wing of Vice, about drones and journalism.
How students at OSU are using drones as scientific tools
Here’s a cinema-related story about the need for a UAS specifically for film.
Nick Atanasio (hilarious take on why drones have a bad rap)