I am looking at my text under the benefit side of the proplem. In the next ten years, my ideas of online office hour will be spread out in all schools along with the developing of technology. It functions pretty simple as the professors/ teachers have a google hangout + professional account, and will be log in there during their office hours. Students can freely call professors/ teachers during their office hours for both class works and personal helps. Basically it works just like skype right now, but I guess it will be a little bit formal since it is a conversation with professors/ teachers. Thus, by ensuring that students can get help from their professors/ teachers when needed despite of the physical distance, it gives students the opportunities to use their wisely time for studying more. However, more important, it is the great tool to build the professional relationship between professors and students which are rarely to happen nowadays due to the limitation of email and how students refuse to continue using the outdating email system of education. To be honest, I do not think that there will be any limitations what this new way of communication will have. First, it is obvious that using the digital way of communication means we can try to maximize the visual elements within the conversation, however there is no way that we can make two parties which have physical distance touch each other within a digital call/ chat online. The second thing I consider is that the lack of laptops among students. However, since it is ten years span, I strongly believe by that time, laptops are cheap and every student has purchase power to laptops. Even if students could not afford one, school would loan students one in order to provide them the best education. I believe my points are true because technology is developing days after days now, thus by 10 years, everyone should be familiar to Google Hangout + or other digital sources to use in online office hour for professors/ teachers depending on schools’ communication system.
I try to make a persuasive argument in which I try to show people, especially students to buy my topic. By using method of comparing and contrast plus future benefits, I draw people’s attention to my project. In another way, I try to make people overlook my primary text and see its potential use toward schools and communities. It is not like I shed to another way to understand my text, but to introduce my text to people. I am not advocating for some policy or quality change, but for the whole communication of school changes. Email is outdated, and schools need to replace it with a more efficient method of communication. That is my real goal; however, if it is impossible, at least I want other professors to offer more flexible method of communicating after reading my paper. Trying to make life easier is not a bad thing. I think for my paper. I will try to conduct a survey with students about their opinion toward email and their reference communication method. This will be my substantial sources about the problems since I have real students to answer real questions concerning to their life throughout four years in campus.